X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs- Message-ID: <19980708183856.23220@cerebro.laendle> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 18:38:56 +0200 From: Marc Lehmann To: beastium Subject: Re: please benchmark / MMX #2 Mail-Followup-To: beastium References: <19980708045815 DOT 20996 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <199807080913 DOT LAA03546 AT Cal012054 DOT student DOT utwente DOT nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <199807080913.LAA03546@Cal012054.student.utwente.nl>; from Derkjan de Haan on Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 11:13:21AM +0200 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.1.108 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.43 19980628 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental)) Status: RO Content-Length: 887 Lines: 21 On Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 11:13:21AM +0200, Derkjan de Haan wrote: > > For Intel Pentium-MMX (3*100 MHz): > > because of these small differences I decided to test a bigger input file > (static mozilla binary, 6 Mb filesize). Here the picture become clearer: > > mmx: 25.34 > nommx: 29.30 > mmxonly: 25.16 Looks good, maybe with some tuning and aggressive analysis (and maybe a different benchmark program) mmx can be a win to pentiums as well. -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |