X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs-
Message-ID: <19980630013727.49448@cerebro.laendle>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 01:37:27 +0200
From: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
To: beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
Subject: Re: bzip2-mx vs. bzip2-nomx
Mail-Followup-To: beastium <beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl>
References: <19980629155048 DOT 25657 AT cerebro DOT laendle> <359818C4 DOT E967ECFB AT mail DOT dotcom DOT fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <359818C4.E967ECFB@mail.dotcom.fr>; from Remi Guyomarch on Tue, Jun 30, 1998 at 12:44:20AM +0200
X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.1.107 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.43 19980628 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental)) 
Status: RO
Content-Length: 681
Lines: 14

On Tue, Jun 30, 1998 at 12:44:20AM +0200, Remi Guyomarch wrote:

> K6-3D and K6-2 are much stronger in this area. They have a dual MMX core
> and will perform better on MMX.

is anybody with such beasts here that can test them against the two bzips?

      -----==-                                              |
      ----==-- _                                            |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                        |
                                                          |