X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs- Delivered-To: pcg AT goof DOT com Message-ID: <19980513130604.54576@cerebro.laendle> Date: Wed, 13 May 1998 13:06:04 +0200 From: Marc Lehmann To: nuke AT bayside DOT net, beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl Subject: Re: pgcc vs AMD K6 Mail-Followup-To: nuke AT bayside DOT net, beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl References: <199805122110 DOT XAA20479 AT unknown DOT ruhr DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from nuke@bayside.net on Wed, May 13, 1998 at 07:50:32AM -0400 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.1.101 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.28 19980508 (gcc2 ss-980502 experimental)) Status: RO Content-Length: 1219 Lines: 25 On Wed, May 13, 1998 at 07:50:32AM -0400, nuke AT bayside DOT net wrote: > > is pgcc going the way of the wind? personally, i like the pentium > improvements, but plain egcs has been much more stable and doesn't choke > on c++. You shouldn't use snapshots if you are unable to use/compile them (you shouldn't use a 2.1 kernel if you can't cope with the problems, either). pgcc-1.0+ will neither choke on C++ nor is it much less stable. (or at least, you haven't reported any problems (well, you reported bugs in the linux kernel to this list, but not in the pgcc releases), see the recent thread on linux-kernel about the difference between "reporting" and "complaining") I love discussion. I even love flaming. But stating "facts" without evidence (as you like to do recently) I hate most. -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |