X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 4 980420 -bs- Delivered-To: pcg AT goof DOT com Message-ID: <19980428231556.26007@cerebro.laendle> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 1998 23:15:56 +0200 From: Marc Lehmann To: frank_stulle AT public DOT uni-hamburg DOT de Cc: beastium Subject: Re: linux, pgcc and xfree332 Mail-Followup-To: frank_stulle AT public DOT uni-hamburg DOT de, beastium References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: ; from frank_stulle@public.uni-hamburg.de on Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 12:38:53AM +0200 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.1.98 (root AT cerebro) (gcc driver version pgcc-2.91.25 19980425 (gcc2 ss-980401 experimental) executing gcc version pgcc-2.91.19) Status: RO Content-Length: 1111 Lines: 20 On Sat, Apr 25, 1998 at 12:38:53AM +0200, frank_stulle AT public DOT uni-hamburg DOT de wrote: > I am using Linux 2.0.32 and I'm wondering if there would be any speed > enhancement when I compile the XFree332-Source with PGCC instead of using the > precompiled binaries? > Do you think this is worth the work? I'm not sure... The speed enhancement depends on your hardware.. a well-accelerated driver usually doesn't get much from improved code. The old XFree2.0 svga server was quite improved back when I had a cirrus and made benchmarks... At the moment, neither egcs nor pgcc seem to be able to compile xfree332 correctly on my system (everything except the servers work fine, though). -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |