X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 3 961213 -bs- Delivered-To: pcg AT goof DOT com Message-ID: <19980314023834.01482@cerebro.laendle> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 02:38:34 +0100 From: Marc Lehmann To: Angelo Pesce Cc: beastium Subject: Re: Pgcc optimization methods / ideas References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 32 DOT 19980313192225 DOT 00699d50 AT uniserv DOT uniplan DOT it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19980313192225.00699d50@uniserv.uniplan.it>; from Angelo Pesce on Fri, Mar 13, 1998 at 07:22:46PM +0100 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.1.85 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.06 980129 (gcc-2.8.0 release)) Status: RO Content-Length: 1336 Lines: 45 On Fri, Mar 13, 1998 at 07:22:46PM +0100, Angelo Pesce wrote: !!!!!!!!!!!!! yehah !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > How does pgcc optimize the output??? look at the source!!! > Which optimization methods are implemented??? look at the source, or the faq!!! > Does it optimize fixed multiplications with the lea method??? try it out!!! (yes) > Does it perform any other "famous" instruction trick??? it's very famous for it's magic indeed!!! (be more specific) > When are you going to implement MMX instructions??? who said i will??? (never, unless intel saves their design or somebody points out to me how this would be possible!!!) > Does it perform floating point/integer instructions pipelining??? try it out!!! (yes) > Is it faster than Watcom C/C++ 11??? i don't use dos!!! > Is the djgcc libc well optimized??? i always wanted to know that, too!!! how about asking that on a djgpp forum!!! -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |