X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 3 961213 -bs- Delivered-To: pcg AT goof DOT com Message-Id: <34E43E6D.492A663D@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 13:37:02 +0100 From: Stefan Huelbrock Organization: Institute for Computer Architecture, University of Tuebingen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.33 i686) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl Subject: -mpentiumpro slows things down (even on PentiumPro) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Marc Lehmann Status: RO X-Status: A Content-Length: 1329 Lines: 40 Hello out there I'm new at this list and my question isn't in the FAQ, so I'm sorry if it _is_ a FAQ. I've compiled and installed pgcc 1.01 on my linuxbox. Optimization for pentium seems to work like a charm: gzip compiled with gcc 2.7.2.1 -O6 needs 69.86s gzip compiled with pgcc 1.01 -O6 needs just 65.4s which is a win of about 6.7percent. Ok... test on a PentiumPro-box gives for gcc 2.7.2.1 -O6 41.8s pgcc 1.01 -O6 42.24s. Allright, the binarie is compiled for a pentium, so theres a little loss to expect. Now trying -mpentiumpro... now it takes pgcc 1.01 -O6 -mpentiumpro 72.41s on a pentium, and pgcc 1.01 -O6 -mpentiumpro 42.13s on a pentiumpro. This is considerable slower than the output of gcc 2.7.2.1. Is this still under development or is the compiler just thought for working well on a pentium with a slower pentiumpro-code as a tradeoff, or do I just miss anything? Maybee my installation isn't flawless? Do you experience the same? BTW tests with bzip2 shows the same results. Thanks in advance Stefan -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Stefan Huelbrock. Voice (+49/0) 7071-29-77176 Uni Tuebingen, WSI, Computer Architecture, Koestlinstr. 6 D-72074 Tuebingen eMail: huelbroc AT informatik DOT uni-tuebingen DOT de --------------------------------------------------i-------------