X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 3 961213 -bs- Delivered-To: pcg AT goof DOT com Message-ID: <19980203033429.63395@cerebro.laendle> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 03:34:29 +0100 From: Marc Lehmann To: nuke AT bayside DOT net Cc: beastium Subject: Re: pgcc-980129 compile problem References: <19980201202316 DOT 44348 AT cerebro DOT laendle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: ; from nuke@bayside.net on Tue, Feb 03, 1998 at 02:14:35AM +0000 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.1.82 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.05 980122 (gcc-2.8.0 release)) Status: RO Content-Length: 1615 Lines: 38 On Tue, Feb 03, 1998 at 02:14:35AM +0000, nuke AT bayside DOT net wrote: > > I guess it is a redhat 5.0 system? (and may I guess this hapens with egcs > > also?) > > nope, debian-hamm system.. based on glibc2 like redhat 5.0 inetresting.. it's quiite interesting, strange, weird, ... > Reading specs from > /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i586-pc-linux-gnu/pgcc-2.90.21/specs > gcc version pgcc-2.90.21 971202 (egcs-1.00 release) hm. > is there any place i should look for that? i'm guessing that it has > something to do with this being a glibc2 system, and that not being > detected right unless you configure'd sth. else than i586-pc-linux-gnu, this should not be the case. anyway, what makes this so strange is that your _installed_ compiler is calling _it's_ cpp with wrong parameters, and the only cause I could imagine is that either thw wrong gcc is called, or the wrong specs file is read. Nothing happened here (I think). A friend of mine has exactly this problem on a redhat-5.0 with egcs-1.0.1, when compiling with gcc-2.7.2.3, so I made a quick but wrong guess. I still haven't the slightest idea.. I guess you have binutils-2.8.1.0.15? (not that this would cure the problems). -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |