X-pop3-spooler: POP3MAIL 2.1.0 b 3 961213 -bs- Delivered-To: pcg AT goof DOT com From: johan19 AT idt DOT net Message-ID: <19980201142736.22334@sophia.idt.net> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 14:27:36 -0800 To: beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl Subject: Re: pgcc-980129 compile problem References: <19980201202316 DOT 44348 AT cerebro DOT laendle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e In-Reply-To: <19980201202316.44348@cerebro.laendle>; from Marc Lehmann on Sun, Feb 01, 1998 at 08:23:16PM +0100 Sender: Marc Lehmann Status: RO X-Status: A Content-Length: 1543 Lines: 39 On Sun, Feb 01, 1998 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 1998 at 09:52:28AM +0000, nuke AT bayside DOT net wrote: > > i get this compiling the latest pgcc: > > I guess it is a redhat 5.0 system? (and may I guess this hapens with egcs > also?) > > I once tried to track it down (on the phone) with a friend, but couldn't > find out what it was. (help appreciated ;) > > > -lang-c -I. -I. -I./config -undef -D__GNUC__=2 -D__GNUC_MINOR__=7 > > -D__ELF__ -Dunix -Dlinux -D__ELF__ -D__unix__ -D__linux__ -D__unix > > -D__linux -Asystem(posix) -D__OPTIMIZE__ -Di386 -Di586 -Asystem(unix) > > -Acpu(i386) -Amachine(i386) -D__i386__ -D__i586__ -Asystem(unix)__ > > -Acpu(i386)__ -Amachine(i386)__ __ __ __ __ __ __ > > __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ -DIN_LIBGCC1 -DL_mulsi3 ./libgcc1.c > > /tmp/cca13517.i > > since your _installed_ gcc calls cpp with illegal args, this is most > probably a bug in the gcc you already have installed.. it might be that gcc > is searching for the wrong files (but I can only imagine the specs file) > > is it 2.7.2.3 from redhat? > > > those __'s aren't valid cpp options, and they're messing things up > > i really have no idea why it's doing this. > > Bad, I don't have either, although I would reaaly like to find > out why gcc is doing sth. that dumb, but I can't reproduce it! i got that when i tried using a 2.7.2 spec file with pgcc. the spec file syntaxs differ slightly (don't ask me why) and that produces all those spurious `__' marks. hope this helps. -- Johan Kullstam johan19 AT idt DOT net