X-POP3-Rcpt: mlehmann AT universe DOT sgh-net DOT de Message-ID: <19980123223036.48589@cerebro.laendle> 23 Jan 1998 22:30:36 +0100 From: Marc Lehmann To: Dustin Marquess Cc: beastium Subject: Re: 6x86 opts References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: ; from Dustin Marquess on Fri, Jan 23, 1998 at 02:13:25PM -0600 X-Operating-System: Linux version 2.1.79 (root AT cerebro) (gcc version pgcc-2.91.03 971225 (gcc-2.8.0)) Status: RO Content-Length: 1324 Lines: 26 On Fri, Jan 23, 1998 at 02:13:25PM -0600, Dustin Marquess wrote: > On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer wrote: > > That's still the case - you're not supposed to use kernel includes > > anymore, which is one of the main advantages of glibc over libc 5.x. > > (Don't hack the include files, hack the programs calling them. There are > > several sites on the net providing patches to some important apps, such as > > http://www.glibc.ml.org/.) > > If you have to hack every program you get in order to get it to > compile under glibc, it kind of breaks portability, not to mention ease of > use... you miss the point... these programs were _BROKEN_, and had to be fixed. do you want a libc that accepts everything so when porting the program to another machine you get mysterious errors, or do you want a libc that forces posix compliance on you, thus saving you from future hassles? -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg AT goof DOT com |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |