X-POP3-Rcpt: mlehmann AT universe DOT sgh-net DOT de
Message-ID: <XFMail.980110015404.multiman@voicenet.com>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.2 [p0] on Linux
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <19980109120603.62837@cerebro.laendle>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 01:54:04 -0500 (EST)
From: multiman <multiman AT voicenet DOT com>
To: beastium-list AT Desk DOT nl
Subject: Re: Linux PGCC 971225 and POV
Sender: Marc Lehmann <pcg AT goof DOT com>
Status: RO
X-Status: AF
Content-Length: 1253
Lines: 31

I am using libc 5.4.38.  I tried using the double-aligning and not using
double-aligning and it ran the same speed with or without it.

On 09-Jan-98 Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 1998 at 12:01:57AM -0500, multiman wrote:
>> To Whom it may concern
>> 
>> When I recompiled POV 3 with pgcc 971225 on Linux the resulting binary ran
>> 3X SLOWER than the offical linux binary on the same scene.
>> 
>> The flags I used where -O6 -mpentium -march=pentium
> 
> hmm... which libc library do you use? have you used the correct
> double-aligning? otherwise, fpu performance under pentiums is
> more or less totally random anyway..
> 
>       -----==-                                              |
>       ----==-- _                                            |
>       ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann       +--
>       --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg AT goof DOT com       |e|
>       -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\                          --+
>     The choice of a GNU generation                        |
>                                                           |

----------------------------------
E-Mail: multiman <multiman AT voicenet DOT com>
Date: 10-Jan-98
Time: 01:51:27

This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------