X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to opendos-bounces using -f From: "Martin Foster" To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Subject: comm speed with m$dos 6.22 Message-ID: Date: Sunday, 18 Jan 2004 15:15:00 -500 X-Mailer: Internet Rex gateway (2.29) In-Reply-To: X-Fido-From: Martin Foster, 2:250/501.2 X-Fido-To: Lindner-Thalmaessing AT t-online DOT de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IgLou-Customer: verified X-Originating-IP: 204.255.230.194 Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: opendos AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Originally to: Lindner-Thalmaessing AT t-online DOT de Hello Peter! - 17.01.04 at 22:56, Lindner-Thalmaessing # t-online.de wrote to All: LT> From: Lindner-Thalmaessing AT t-online DOT de LT> Hello, LT> being blind I'm forced to use m$dos. LT> My 38.400-modem however, in dos transmits max 19.200 bps. LT> The dos mail program used is called UKA_PPP. LT> According to the German documentation for m$dos 6.22 the following LT> is what I do understand: LT> MODE configures devices (in my case COM2 for my modem) in the LT> system. The list for valid baud rates for MODE in m$dos 6.22, LT> however, only goes up to 19.200 bps. LT> Is there a trick existing or a tsr to load to make data transfer LT> faster (similar to INTERSVR or INTERLNK, both making up to 115.200 LT> bps) in m$dos 6.22? LT> My processor speed is 300 MHz. Having used UKA_PPP for quite some time in the past, I can say there's no trick involved at all. So long as you provide UKA_PPP with the following information, there shouldn't be a problem with data transfer rates: ComPort ComPort address ComPort IRQ Baudrate (this should preferably be 115200 but 57600 would suffice) Modem init string There is absolutely no need whatsoever for the M$DOS MODE stuff! I feel that your problem *may* lie with your modem init string. What modem is it exactly? What chipset has it got? What init string are you using in UKA_PPP? LT> Thanks and regards, Hope the above information helps ..... Regards, Martin