X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to opendos-bounces using -f
Message-ID: <213B4DD669E9D31198660090277565633D9C5A@EXCHANGE>
From: Jacob Brewer <Jacob DOT Brewer AT oasisgamingusa DOT com>
To: "'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: DR Dos on a P4
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:22:43 -0600 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-2"
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

man with nasm that was really easy :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Jacob Brewer [mailto:Jacob DOT Brewer AT oasisgamingusa DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:52 PM
To: 'opendos AT delorie DOT com'
Subject: RE: DR Dos on a P4


Yes, and thank you I am testing with it now (So far it is very good!)  Our
current client is very paranoid (go figure in the gamin industry) and
reviews all of our source before it is fielded.  So if I am asked,  I have
to be able to rebuild all of these files (they aren't coders, but they do
have some things they look for) :(

BTW I attached the modified asm files.  I am currently downloading NASM.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michal H. Tyc [mailto:mht AT bttr-software DOT de]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:58 AM
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DR Dos on a P4


On Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:06:36 -0600, Jacob Brewer wrote:

> My assembler isn't too good.  I am having problems getting the line "not
> dword [es:bx + di]" to compile in MASM6.11.  I am getting a syntax error
:(
> Is it the same as "not [es:bx + di]"

This source is in NASM syntax, which is somewhat simplified
in comparison with MASM. In some aspects (like square brackets
around memory references) it resembles TASM in Ideal mode.
Sometimes I like NASM and sometimes I don't... nobody is perfect.

Anyway, it seems that Arkady already explained everything.

BTW, didn't you get my private message with CLRVDISK.COM attached,
or you just want to rebuild it from the source?

Michal