X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to opendos-bounces using -f
Message-ID: <3FD0AF17.9060308@2net.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 16:15:19 +0000
From: Chris Simmonds <chris AT 2net DOT co DOT uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030821
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: A question about the future of DRDOS
References: <20031205134754 DOT 20456 DOT qmail AT web14522 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <20031205134754.20456.qmail@web14522.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.5.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com



Point 1: you can get a US software patent on almost anything (I have one 
myself). Microsoft have one on copying data from one memory location to 
another.

Point 2: These patents all relate to the use of LFN in FAT file systems. 
Plain FAT 12 and FAT 16 file systems are not covered, so far as I can 
tell. This may explain the relicense of some manufacturers to release 
LFN compatibility code.

So, I expect all those floppy disks and Compact Flash will be 25 cents 
more expensive in the future?

Chris.

Martin C wrote:
>>>And what about M$ trying to patent their FAT fs?
>>
>>Is
>>
>>>that harmful or what? What do you think about
>>
>>that?
>>When did they try this?
> 
> 
> I read about it yesterday: 
> http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/tech/fat.asp
>