X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to opendos-bounces using -f From: shadow AT shadowgard DOT com To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:49:27 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: confirm before over-write Message-ID: <3F76E6E7.32632.7137781@localhost> In-reply-to: <1A3f2E-0IBhZI0@fwd00.sul.t-online.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: opendos AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 28 Sep 2003 at 19:08, Lindner-Thalmaessing AT t-online wrote: > *DOS-version 4.22*??? Leonard Erickson objected (absolutely correct): > > > This is the first *I* have ever heard of a version > > 4.22. The only 4.x versions I'd ever heard of before > > were 4.00, which was a major disaster and 4.01 which > > fixed the bugs that made 4.00 the disaster. > > Would you be so kind as to type VER at a DOS prompt > > and posted what it returns, along with a > > translation? > > Sorry |-( *my fault*! My (German) version of MS-DOS is 6.22, not 4.22. > Typing VER on my system returns "4DOS 5.50 DOS 6,22". As far as I > know vs 6.22 is the last vs of MS-DOS, at least in Germany. My > directory C:\DOS shows(vs# in time stamp): XCOPY.EXE 17.250 > A 31/05/1994 06:22:00 MOVE.EXE 18.613 A 31/05/1994 > 06:22:00 I think that IBM released a version 7 of PC-DOS. And the DOS that underlies Win95 and Win 98 is a version 7. > Nevertheless - I wonder but now have learned that there must be a lot > of users still using and remembering much older DOS versions than me, > and work on even more ancient computers. The 3-/4-versions were up to > date before I became blind in 1991/92, and I worked with them as long > I still could see. I have a copy of PC-DOS 1.1. :-) > Q 1: Is there no environment variable named COPYCMD in other 6.22-vs? I can't check that until I get a chance to boot one of my systems under DOS 5 & 6. > Q 2: How differs the command line syntax of XCOPY in other than German > vs? Well, I posted the syntax of the versions I could check easily. Checking others would require digging out old boot disks. -- Leonard Erickson (aka shadow) shadow at krypton dot rain dot com