Message-ID: <000d01c280c9$6baee100$c03dfea9@atlantis>
From: "Matthias Paul" <Matthias DOT Paul AT post DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Fw: Combining DR-DOS 7.03 with OEM DR-DOS 7.05 to gain LBA capabilities
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 02:15:04 +0100
Organization: Aachen University of Technology (RWTH), Germany
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g9VAkJa02343
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

Hi,

Joe da Silva asked me to forward this post into the list, since
his recent posts always bounced. I assume, this is because of the
(otherwise) great new anti-SPAM measures DJ Delorie has implemented.
If you post from a different account now, you need to be subscribed
to a special "post-only" list in addition to the normal list. I don't
know the details, but aren't there any hints on this new setup on
http://www.delorie.com?

Greetings,

 Matthias

> -----Original Message-----
> From: da Silva, Joe
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:19 PM
> To: 'opendos AT delorie DOT com'
> Subject: RE: Combining DR-DOS 7.03 with OEM DR-DOS 7.05 to gain LBA
> capabilities
>
> One further question occurs to me ... is this "rename bug" the only
> problem with DR-DOS 7.04/7.05?
>
> If so, might it be possible to inhibit "REN" in DR-DOS 7.05, rather
> than inhibiting FAT32 logging in a DR-DOS 7.03/7.05 hybrid? This
> would provide greater functionality, particularly with the prevalence
> of FAT32 disk systems today. Perhaps the "REN" functionality
> could then be provided instead by 'LREN', from Odi's LFN tools?
>
> Also, if "REN" is buggy in DR-DOS 7.04/7.05, is "MOVE" buggy too?
>
> Joe.