Message-ID: <002801c264fd$d34d09a0$3036ed18@ross2mustss87c> From: "John T Ross" To: Subject: Combining DR-DOS 7.03 with OEM DR-DOS 7.05 to gain LBA capabilities Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:41:25 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com On 9/23/02 Matthias Paul wrote: > What do you mean by DR-DOS 7.03B or 7.03C? Since you still > use the 7.03 IBMDOS.COM file, the DOS kernel (BDOS) would > not change in any way. When I installed DR-DOS 7.03 on my laptop, and typed VER at the command prompt, the OS reports it's DR-DOS 7.03b. I don't recall anymore about the verbage. Whether it stated Caldera, Lineo, or Digital Research. I no longer have DR-DOS 7.03 installed on that particular drive. I was having problems with not enough memory when loading drivers for my PCMCIA drive. We discussed this once before in private e-mail wherein you asked me for the dates of certain files in the program. I believe you told me I had the latest version of those files installed. If you peruse this site, http://www.opus.co.tt/dave/index.htm , under Alternative DOSes you'll also find a link to Lineo DR-DOS 7.03b that launches into Florian Xaver's www.drdos.org . Anyways, I took another look at your article, Caldera OpenDOS - A fresh breeze in DOS technology, at http://www.uni-bonn.de/~uzs180/opendeng.html . From the information there I determine there will not be any new releases or updates to DR-DOS 7.03. My hinting for a version 7.03c was inappropriate. It appears the next step would be Caldera's OpenDOS 7.02. In simple layman's terms what does it do that DR-DOS 7.03 doesn't? Yours, John