Message-ID: <01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A4FD687E@emwatent02.meters.com.au>
From: "da Silva, Joe" <Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com>
To: "'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: NLS and lowercase
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:56:11 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id g8ANvF327820
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

Yep - CPM lives on!  <VBG>

Joe.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Arkady V.Belousov [SMTP:ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su]
> Sent:	Sunday, September 08, 2002 9:21 PM
> To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject:	Re: NLS and lowercase
> 
> X-Comment-To: shadow AT krypton DOT rain DOT com
> 
> Hi!
> 
> 8-σΕΞ-2002 00:25 shadow AT krypton DOT rain DOT com (shadow AT krypton DOT rain DOT com) wrote
> to
> opendos AT delorie DOT com:
> 
> >>      Are someone know why MS gives in its API two different upcase
> tables -
> >> "uppercase table" (INT 21/6502) and "filename uppercase table" (6504)
> and
> >> what there may differ?
> src> Because there are some characters allowed in documents that aren't
> src> allowed in filenames.
> 
>      Hm, very good point. (I know $E5, at least).
> 
	-------- snip --------