To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Comment-To: "da Silva, Joe" <Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com>
References: <01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A455A662 AT emwatent02 DOT meters DOT com DOT au>
Message-Id: <2.07b7.9JIO.GEK5B0@belous.munic.msk.su>
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date: Thu,  7 Jun 2001 15:30:36 +0400 (MSD)
Organization: Locus
X-Mailer: dMail [Demos Mail for DOS v2.07b7]
Subject: RE: New DOS stuff - WDOSX 0.96
Lines: 29
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by postbox.mos.ru id f57BXBc28659
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id HAA23587
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

X-Comment-To: da Silva, Joe

Hi!

7-éÀÎ-2001 09:44 Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com (da Silva, Joe) wrote to
"'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>:

dJ> OK ... sounds like STUBIT just won't run for you, regardless of
dJ> the option you use with it (when you run Stacker or QEMM).

     I mean - without options.

dJ> BTW, STUBIT has Unix-like tendencies - it does not recognise
dJ> "/?" or "/H" for command line help (de facto DOS standard). For
dJ> command line help, just invoke without arguments ...

dJ> However, I think you misunderstood my first question. Remember
dJ> you said that STUBIT would run OK under a plain DOS boot?
dJ> Well, does the stubbed executable it produces (ie. your application)
dJ> work OK? In particular, does it work after you reboot with QEMM
dJ> and Stacker loaded?

     If even STUBIT itself not runs properly, why you think stubbed app will
work (always) correctly?

     Joe: if you really interested in debugging WDOSX, then let we come to
mail and you propose some map what I should do to test WDOSX to find the
problem source. Else if you only curious for itself will stubbed app
(sometime) work on test machine - then sorry...