Message-ID: <01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A455A64F@emwatent02.meters.com.au> From: "da Silva, Joe" To: "'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" Subject: RE: New DOS stuff - WDOSX 0.96 Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:11:36 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id AAA30404 Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com No, that's not good compatibility! :-( Like I said, I have used 3 DOSes with their own EMM386, no problem. In your case, perhaps you need to configure QEMM a bit differently or use EMM386. I don't know what the problem with Stacker might be ... :-( Joe. > -----Original Message----- > From: Arkady V.Belousov [SMTP:ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su] > Sent: Friday, 1 June 2001 11:14 > To: opendos AT delorie DOT com > Subject: RE: New DOS stuff - WDOSX 0.96 > > X-Comment-To: da Silva, Joe > > Hi! > > 1-éÀÎ-2001 09:41 Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com (da Silva, Joe) wrote to > "'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" : > > dJ> I've never used QEMM and have no access to it, to try it. What I > dJ> have heard about QEMM is mostly good, so it's probably not the > dJ> problem. OTOH, it is more "aggressive" in re-allocating upper > dJ> memory space, so you might have a subtle conflict with your > dJ> PC. Try using a more conservative configuration, first. Even better, > dJ> try just HIMEM.SYS (no QEMM or EMM386) to see if this makes > dJ> a difference. If you still can't stub your executable, send me a > dJ> copy by direct e-mail (not to the list, of course) and I will see if > dJ> I can "stub" it ... > > I trie some configration: > > 1. Plain (F5) with no Stacker (its executable renamed), no QEMM > 2. Plain (F5) with Stacker > 3. Normal - with QEMM (but without Stacker) > 4. Normal - with all programs loaded > > STUBIT runs only in first configuration. This is not very good > "compatability indication".