Message-ID: <01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A455A5FB@emwatent02.meters.com.au> From: "da Silva, Joe" To: "'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" Subject: RE: networking with dos Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 09:32:16 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Oops - I inadvertently sent this message to Bob earlier, instead of the list. Apologies to all (particularly Bob) ... No, there's no problem with that ... the server's file system is more-or-less irrelevant, as the DOS machine's interface to the files is via the M$ Client redirector API, not via hardware or low level BIOS functions ... Joe. ____ | From: Robert W Moss | To: opendos AT delorie DOT com | Cc: | Sent: 08 May, 2001 08:56 AM | Subject: Re: networking with dos | | | Could it possibly be a FAT32 problem, where WIN9x in | FAT32 is not | readable with a dos machine? You could try using a | good third party | program like Partition Magic, or several others out | there, and convert | your WIN9x machines to Fat, then try again. | | BOB 'DOMAN' MOSS | | On Mon, 7 May 2001 17:37:15 +1000 "da Silva, Joe" | writes: | > OK ... so you don't need a peer-peer arrangement | between | > your Windoze machine(s) and your DOS machine(s), | just a | > client-server arrangement ... | > | > To recap, you can connect your DOS machine to a | Windoze | > NT server, but not to a Windoze 95/98 server? Hmmm | ... the | > M$ Client "readme.txt" file says it can connect to a | WFW or | > Windoze NT server. However, this stuff has not been | changed | > since 1995 (AFAIK), so I think the reason Windoze 9X | is not | > mentioned is simply because this M$ Client stuff | precedes it. | > | > If you can (1) connect your DOS machine to an NT | server and | > (2) connect a Windoze machine to a 9X server, then | you should | > also be able to connect your DOS machine to a 9X | server. I'm | > no expert on this SMB stuff, but I can't see any | reason why not. | > Perhaps the problem is the Windoze 9X machine setup? | > | > Joe. | > | > > -----Original Message----- | > > From: Pepino Voorhoeve | [SMTP:P DOT Voorhoeve AT net DOT HCC DOT nl] | > > Sent: Friday, 4 May 2001 20:45 | > > To: opendos AT delorie DOT com | > > Subject: RE: networking with dos | > > | > > On Tue, 1 May 2001 18:12:25 +1000, da Silva, Joe | wrote: | > > | > > >Oh ... I see! (Why didn't you say this before?) | > > > | > > I thought I did. | > > I certainly did try it. | > > | > > >Well, I have never used this stuff peer-to-peer, | but if you mean | > sharing | > > >resources that reside on DOS machines, then I'm | sure that is | > possible | > > >(although I don't do that, myself). | > > | > > No, not necessairly, but I want to use the stuff | on the | > Windwos-machine | > > | > > > | > > >When you start the network services, you have two | possible modes | > : | > > >1. Basic services. In this mode you can access | drives and | > printers | > > > from other machines on the network. That's | about all. | > > | > > Yes, but I can't get a connection with the Windows | machine, even | > > everything seems to working allright. | > > | > > | > > >2. Full services. In this mode, you can do the | above, plus access | > > > your M$-Exchange mail server (using | M$-Exchange for DOS) and, | > > > IIRC, you can also share your machine's | resources with the | > rest | > > > of the network. | > > | > > Using MSexchange would be a nice experiment, that | is for later, | > because I | > > only use it at my work. | > > | > > Thanks so far. | > > | > > I will still looking and trying. | > > | > > Pepino | | _______________________________________________________ | _________ | GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! | Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! | Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: | http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. |