Message-ID: <3ADF7874.E9C574B0@pysmatic.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 16:44:52 -0700
From: Neal <lbneal AT pysmatic DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DOS issues #2
References: <200104191133 DOT HAA09260 AT delorie DOT com> <3ADF3730 DOT B0683029 AT cornell DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

Alan -

If MS-DOG is so good, why are you on the DR-DOS list ???

Neal
http://dosonly.com/
====


Alan S. wrote:
> 
> I guess I'm a little confused--  Aside from specialized needs for (say)
> embedded platforms, why are we looking for another NEW non Microsoft
> DOS? and what functionality would/should it have that is not already
> present in, e.g., the OS/2 DOS emulator? [which I frequently see
> remaindered in California for about $4.95 per copy of OS/2 version 2x.]
> 
> Alan S.
> 4-19-2001
>