To: opendos AT delorie DOT com X-Comment-To: "Alan S." References: <200104072210 DOT SAA14388 AT delorie DOT com> <3ACFF9D0 DOT 681E32CF AT cornell DOT edu> <2 DOT 07b7 DOT W72P DOT GBGSPU AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su> <3AD05889 DOT EE975A73 AT cornell DOT edu> Message-Id: <2.07b7.T9PH.GBHRJN@belous.munic.msk.su> From: "Arkady V.Belousov" Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 00:57:23 +0400 (MSD) Organization: Locus X-Mailer: dMail [Demos Mail for DOS v2.07b7] Subject: Re: [off-topic] shutting down Lines: 23 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com X-Comment-To: Alan S. Hi! 8-сав-2001 05:24 as173 AT cornell DOT edu (Alan S.) wrote to opendos AT delorie DOT com: >> Not very so. In 1889 on the I General conference was affirmed the 1 >> kilogramm as weight of 1 litre (1 dm^3) clear water at temperature of ___^^^^^^^^^ >> its most density. First weight etalon was implemented as platinum ___________________________^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> cylinder block at height and diameter of 39 cm. But later was find >> out that prototype was implemented not too precise and litre become ____________^^^^^^^^^ >> not equal to 1 dm^3 (but with 0,0028% error). This was corrected on >> the XII General conference in 1964. AS> "The unit of volume, the liter, was originally defined as 1 cubic AS> decimeter (cdm3), but in 1901 it was redefined as the volume occupied by AS> a kilogram of water at 4 C at 760 mm of mercury; in 1964 the original AS> definition (cdm3) was restored." This looks slightly mad - kilogramm defined across of liter(-re), which defined across kilogramm. :)