Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 22:40:32 -0700 From: "Alan S." Subject: Re: [off-topic] shutting down To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Message-id: <3ACFF9D0.681E32CF@cornell.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en References: <200104072210 DOT SAA14388 AT delorie DOT com> Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com However, IIRC, there are two very slightly different 'inches', viz.: The 'Historical' Imperial Inch equal to 2.539998... cm and the SI Inch which is an (SI) Special Name for [exactly] 2.54 cm You have to be a true pedant to distinguish between the two -- they differ by only 0.000 078 740 219 480 487 779 911 637 73 % after all. But the resizing (enlargement!) of the inch resulted in some simplification in conversions especially in the pre calculator and pre PC days. [ For that matter, the litre was resized from 1,000.028 cubic cm to be a Special Name for (exactly) 1,000 cubic cm in 1964. ] Alan S. 4-7-2001 rgrunsk AT attglobal DOT net wrote: > > In <2 DOT 07b7 DOT V7YB DOT GBFYZF AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>, on 04/08/01 > at 01:42 AM, "Arkady V.Belousov" said: > > > In 1975 Congress of USA decise to accept SI metric system in the > >10 years period, but up to now there used non-metric units like `inch', > >`foot', `lb', `gallon', etc. More worser, American units differes from > >English: English gallon=4.54 litre, American gallon=3.78 litre. Same > >for most other units, including inch. > > Uh No! > > There is a US and Imperial system of measure for volume (Ounce, gallon > etc) but the units of linear measure and all others are the same. There > is *NO* such thing as a US Inch vs an Imperial Inch. You may be thinking > of the statute mile and the nautical mile (knot) which are two different > measures. > > Most Commonwealth countries have now gone to SI units but the Imperial > system is still legal and used. In Canada, lumber measurements are still > given in inches.