Message-ID: <01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A4021F9E@emwatent02.meters.com.au>
From: "da Silva, Joe" <Joe DOT daSilva AT emailmetering DOT com>
To: "'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: What version would be best?
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 12:39:05 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

IMHO, the most stable DR-DOS is 6.0 (4/92 edition, with updates). You
can't squeeze the absolute maximum conventional memory with it, but
it's very compact and very stable (even EMM386 works properly!).   <g>

BTW, if you need DPMI for it, use CWSDPMI (sp?) ...

Not sure about licensing, though!   :-(

Joe.

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Dale Coleman [SMTP:kf4sir AT earthlink DOT net]
> Sent:	Sunday, 25 February 2001 4:53
> To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject:	What version would be best?
> 
> Hi all, I want to be able to run some DOS programs on a 2nd computer that 
> needs DOS installed.  Looking for the most stable version of Open DOS or 
> DR-DOS.
> 
> Network and 32bit file support not needed.
> 
> Also, is there a archive of this maillist?
> 
> Thanks, Dale
> 
> -
> Dale Coleman
> kf4sir AT earthlink DOT net
> http://home.earthlink.net/~kf4sir