To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Comment-To: "Patrick Moran" <pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com>
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 16 DOT 19910215184745 DOT 2ac78bfe AT tellus DOT swip DOT net>
    <032a01c09dd5$76445b00$34822a40 AT dbcooper>
Message-Id: <2.07b7.PURT.G989DG@belous.munic.msk.su>
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 23:39:16 +0300 (MSK)
Organization: Locus
X-Mailer: dMail [Demos Mail for DOS v2.07b7]
Subject: Re: prob audio CD on 2nd CD-ROM with NWCDEX
Lines: 20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

X-Comment-To: Patrick Moran

Hi!

23-ζΕΧ-2001 12:03 pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com (Patrick Moran) wrote to
<opendos AT delorie DOT com>:

PM> You did not read what I wrote very well. I said a K6-III+ 450Mhz. If you
PM> wish to do some research on it, you'll find that it is comparable in
PM> speed to the Duron! The reason I chose this, is because I don't want to

     Try to run some floating point programs/benchmarks (Quake, for example)
on both and then make such statements. K6 have only two advantages in
compare with K7 (Athlon/Duron): (1) it works on Socket 7/Super 7 (designed
for Pentium MMX and works with any compatible CPU) whereas K7 works on Slot
A and Socket A (AMD's alternative for Slot 1 and Socket 370) and (2) it
consumes only 14W at 550 MHz whereas Duron consumes 24W at 700 MHz.

     First advantage is under question (note: Super 7 allows multipler only
up to 6 at FSB=100 MHz).