Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 22:14:40 -0500 (EST)
From: M Ross <p046715b AT pb DOT seflin DOT org>
Subject: DOS v. Windooozz
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <20010219015705.9E5DD50010@zagnut.hotpop.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.10102182208.A27964-0100000@pb.seflin.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I have been reading all messages entered into this list for over 30days, 
& not one message talks of DOS without some mention of Windoozz.  I 
wonder if DOS of any sort could exist without Windoozz.   Not according 
to all the gurus here.

I hope I am wrong & someboby can take me to task, & show me up.  I would 
then be able to read a REAL "OPEN DOS / DR-DOS" message system.  It is 
Sunday night, I am tired.  Am I also out of it?  Boozed?

Windoozz - Irrelevant!  I just want DOS.  Preferably DR-DOS or child of!  
Else I will just move on to Windoozz, completely.  Why stop here?

The Best To You & Your's,
Ross ARR
ico p046715b AT pb DOT seflin DOT org