Message-ID: <01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A4021F5C@emwatent02.meters.com.au> From: "da Silva, Joe" To: "'opendos AT delorie DOT com'" Subject: RE: prob audio CD on 2nd CD-ROM with NWCDEX Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:49:04 +1100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Aarghhh!! Here is an e-mail extract, to refresh your memory : Slave at first EIDE is a CD-RW; slave at second IDE 4xCDROM. Joe. > -----Original Message----- > From: Patrick Moran [SMTP:pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com] > Sent: Thursday, 15 February 2001 12:47 > To: opendos AT delorie DOT com > Subject: Re: prob audio CD on 2nd CD-ROM with NWCDEX > > That was a 24X, not a 4X and as far as I know all 24X drives are ATAPI > drives. My drive is a 4X but it is SCSI, so I could care less about it > interferring with anything. > > > Pat > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "da Silva, Joe" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:22 PM > Subject: RE: prob audio CD on 2nd CD-ROM with NWCDEX > > > > Answer : Because at least one of his drives, ie. the 4X > > CD-ROM, is most likely to *pre-date* the ATAPI standard > > and is therefore unlikely to comply with it! > > > > Please do not confuse the ATA standard(s) with the > > ATAPI standard, although they have now merged > > somewhat. The ATAPI standard was developed much > > later (and by a different group) than the ATA standard. > > > > Furthermore, it is quite possible that what we see > > in this instance is simply a bug in the software, be > > it NWCDEX or the "Player" software (which may > > assume that only one CD-ROM-like drive exists, > > and ignore the second drive). > > > > Joe. > > > ----- snip -----