X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <007101c096f1$31523610$1a822a40@dbcooper> From: "Patrick Moran" To: References: <01FD6EC775C6D4119CDF0090273F74A4021F59 AT emwatent02 DOT meters DOT com DOT au> Subject: Re: prob audio CD on 2nd CD-ROM with NWCDEX Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:46:57 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com That was a 24X, not a 4X and as far as I know all 24X drives are ATAPI drives. My drive is a 4X but it is SCSI, so I could care less about it interferring with anything. Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "da Silva, Joe" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 4:22 PM Subject: RE: prob audio CD on 2nd CD-ROM with NWCDEX > Answer : Because at least one of his drives, ie. the 4X > CD-ROM, is most likely to *pre-date* the ATAPI standard > and is therefore unlikely to comply with it! > > Please do not confuse the ATA standard(s) with the > ATAPI standard, although they have now merged > somewhat. The ATAPI standard was developed much > later (and by a different group) than the ATA standard. > > Furthermore, it is quite possible that what we see > in this instance is simply a bug in the software, be > it NWCDEX or the "Player" software (which may > assume that only one CD-ROM-like drive exists, > and ignore the second drive). > > Joe. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Patrick Moran [SMTP:pmoran22 AT yahoo DOT com] > > Sent: Thursday, 15 February 2001 3:48 > > To: opendos AT delorie DOT com > > Subject: Re: prob audio CD on 2nd CD-ROM with NWCDEX > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "da Silva, Joe" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 1:59 AM > > Subject: RE: prob audio CD on 2nd CD-ROM with NWCDEX > > > > > > > The problem with IDE CD-ROMs (don't know anything about > > > ZIP and LS-120) is that the manufacturers started "adapting" > > > IDE (ATA) to "make it happen", since the ATA standard had > > > only been intended for hard disks! So in the beginning was > > > chaos, with different manufacturers doing their own thing, > > > until common-sense prevailed and the various parties got > > > together to formulate the ATAPI standard (to suit such devices > > > as CD-ROM and tape drives). Since then, compatibility has > > > improved enormously, which is why it is now possible for > > > the BIOS itself to recognize and communicate (eg. boot > > > from) an ATAPI (aka. IDE) CD-ROM. > > > > I don't mean to be cruel here, but if the so-called ATAPI STANDARD is so > > standard they why is Utz having problems with two APATI devices? > > > ----- snip ----- > > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com