X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <008201c05d17$e7857cd0$a3881004@dbcooper> From: "Patrick Moran" To: References: <01c05c4f$1af046a0$e55cb7d4 AT default> <2 DOT 07b7 DOT 11CJ5 DOT G4XUGY AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su> Subject: Re: BASIC & EMS (was: Optimizing CONFIG.SYS...) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 13:30:12 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arkady V.Belousov" To: Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 4:26 AM Subject: Re: BASIC & EMS (was: Optimizing CONFIG.SYS...) > X-Comment-To: Florian Xaver > > Hi! > > 2-δΕΛ-2000 12:00 dos DOT fire AT aon DOT at (Florian Xaver) wrote to : > > >>PM> DV is not a true multi-tasker, it shares CPU time between applications > >>PM> loaded, just like Gates' stupid WINDOZE does. > >> Wrong. Yes, Win 3.x is an "preemtive multasking" (i.e. cooperative > >>multitasking) but Win95 is an... hm, forget the word which describes > >>displaced multitasking... for Win95 native apps, also as DV, Linux and... NT. > FX> Wrong :)) > FX> Win3.x and Win9x are cooperative multitasking, The latest version Desqview > FX> (not older versions) and Dr-DOS taskmanager (7.03) are pre-emptive > FX> multitasking which is much better. I did not use the latest version of DV, I used something 2.6x and even earlier ones and they too were pre-emptive multi-yasking. I believe the first I used was 2.3x and it was also pre-emptive if I remember correctly. But that was many years ago that I used 2.3x and could be mistaken. But I am certain that the last two version I used were both pre-emptive. Pat _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com