To: opendos AT delorie DOT com X-Comment-To: "Florian Xaver" References: <01c05c4f$1af046a0$e55cb7d4 AT default> Message-Id: <2.07b7.11CJ5.G4XUGY@belous.munic.msk.su> From: "Arkady V.Belousov" Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 14:26:58 +0300 (MSK) Organization: Locus X-Mailer: dMail [Demos Mail for DOS v2.07b7] Subject: Re: BASIC & EMS (was: Optimizing CONFIG.SYS...) Lines: 21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com X-Comment-To: Florian Xaver Hi! 2-δΕΛ-2000 12:00 dos DOT fire AT aon DOT at (Florian Xaver) wrote to : >>PM> DV is not a true multi-tasker, it shares CPU time between applications >>PM> loaded, just like Gates' stupid WINDOZE does. >> Wrong. Yes, Win 3.x is an "preemtive multasking" (i.e. cooperative >>multitasking) but Win95 is an... hm, forget the word which describes >>displaced multitasking... for Win95 native apps, also as DV, Linux and... NT. FX> Wrong :)) FX> Win3.x and Win9x are cooperative multitasking, The latest version Desqview FX> (not older versions) and Dr-DOS taskmanager (7.03) are pre-emptive FX> multitasking which is much better. Oh, yes. :( I muddle the "preemptive" word with "cooperative". But I mistake only in this: Win 3.x cooperative for "Win3 apps" and preemptive for DOS apps. Win95 cooperative for "Win3 apps" (for compatability reasons) _but_ preemptive for both DOS and "Win95" apps. Yes, Win95 have some jams when both Win3 and Win95 apps call, say, GDI, but this is another history.