X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <012e01c04380$e8558ed0$8b8a1004@dbcooper> From: "Patrick Moran" To: References: <20001029 DOT 211112 DOT -3972137 DOT 1 DOT domanspc AT juno DOT com> <39FD0A77 DOT 6D5C4313 AT internet1 DOT net> <011101c042dd$31534400$3d1e0404 AT dbcooper> <017601c04365$40df2e60$11fea8c0 AT dell> Subject: Re: A little history Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 14:21:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Hi Ben, I cannot speak from personal experience because I only use PNW. However I have heard many complain about paying extortion to Novell for bug fixes. I also believe that in order to talk to them about problems you have with Netware, you have to call a 1-900 number and pay extortion for them to help you fix problems. They used to get $90/hr extortion for this so-called service. It is probably much higher now. BTW that is one reason I will not sell nor recommend Quantum drives. they extort money from you through a 1-900 support. Pat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ben A L Jemmett" To: Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 9:54 AM Subject: Re: A little history > > As > > for SCO, you must not have heard of the many horror stories about it and > > people were forced to upgrade to get rid of those bugs and pay big, big > > bucks to upgrade. Much like MS crap and Novell Netware. > Huh? What? Apart from the last few NW5 service packs, NetWare is certainly > not bug-ridden enough to be compared to MS's attempts at software > engineering. NetWare 3.2 (actually 3.12 with all the patches - 3.12 is > dated 12th March, 1993) is rock solid. 4.11/4.2 I've no first-hand > experience with, but is pretty much the same. I run NetWare 5 beta 3 on my > development server here and it only crashes when I muck up something in my > code. > > The majority of bug-fixes on NetWare are as patch NLMs, which load > themselves over parts of the kernel using the Patch Manager (PMxxx.NLM) or > replacement service NLMs. 4 and 5 have Service Packs, like NT, which are > all the patches and upgrades at once (although their quality control is > slipping lately). > > Regards, > Ben A L Jemmett. > (http://web.ukonline.co.uk/ben.jemmett/, http://www.deltasoft.com/) _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com