Message-Id: <200010290356.XAA22793@xellos.bignet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
From: "Mark at Cross+Road's" <mark1 AT mich DOT com>
CC: <davidru AT home DOT com>, <Re:attachments AT xellos DOT bignet DOT net (is HTML)>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 23:56:42 +0400
X-Mailer: Net-Tamer 1.12.0
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

No!, No and a third time no!
No mercy here!  You will just be forced to spend the next ten years
computing on the "dreaded" Compaq, however since I own one of those blasted
machines myself we'll need to change the punishment to something really
more terrible, a Packard-Bel instead!
   BTW,  All of this traffic is just going to have-to stop it's getting
to-much like a list and that won't do, gonna need to use digest and then
where will we be without just the monthly reminder/wake-up call being lost
in all of this traffic, never be able to fall asleep again.  However does
anyone here still use DrDOS-Opendos-... or am I only one left?  What about
IBM's PC-dos 2000?  You can still buy it from IBM even in floppy I believe!
Does anyone use it and how does it compare to DrDOS #703?  Has it also got a
bootloader which automatically dectects W95-or 98?  Is it more stable with
"no" emm386 errors?  Do you know of a "list" for it's users?
    Just wondering.
    Mark



On 2000-10-28 opendos AT delorie DOT com said:
   >Oops! I imagined I was replying to Mr. Stevenson
   >alone. I did not check the origin of the message before I replied.
   >Mea culpa. I throw myself on the mercy of the court.
   >Apologies all around.
   >-----Original Message-----
   >Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 4:16 PM
   ><< File: ATT00007.txt; charset = Windows-1252 >>