From: fernande AT internet1 DOT net
Message-ID: <39C8F397.A136BC3A@internet1.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 13:27:51 -0400
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: About Micro$quash DOS 7 (hiding in Win98).
References: <Pine DOT GSO DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT iB1 DOT 0 DOT 1000920003048 DOT 17521A-100000 AT vtn1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

I would definetly use 98lite.  I have even thought of buying there full
version to take it even further.  I am using the demo version on my main
machine now.

Chad Fernandez
Michigan, USA

"John K. Picken" wrote:
> W98 requires 66mhz but this can be defeated using a command line switch
> with setup.exe. W95 worked quite well on a 486 DX2 for me with 24mb but
> only until I took out the fast IDE HDD and replaced it with older, slower,
> spares.
> 
> If you use 98Lite, W98 is doable on a DX2. In fact, I wouldn't use W98 on
> my P120 without 98Lite.
> 
> jkp