Subject: Re: Hi !
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 20:35:55 +0100 (BST)
In-Reply-To: <20000717.192121.-238167.2.editor@juno.com> from "Bruce Morgen" at Jul 17, 2000 07:21:14 
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E13EGgG-0000dq-00@seasip.demon.co.uk>
From: John Elliott <jce AT seasip DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

: > CP/M-86 was based on CP/M 
: > 3, and DOS Plus/DR DOS on CP/M 4).

  Actually, CP/M-86 1.2 is much closer to CP/M 2.  
Personal CP/M-86 2.0 is the equivalent of CP/M 3, though its BDOS is 
version 4.

: I've never heard of "CP/M 4," 
: and I was intimately involved in 
: the 8-bit CP/M world throughout 
: the '80s.  What did I miss?
 
  There never was an 8-bit CP/M 4. There are two 16-bit OSes 
(Personal CP/M-86 and DOSPlus) which both return a BDOS version number of 
4.x.

------------- http://www.seasip.demon.co.uk/index.html --------------------
John Elliott           |BLOODNOK: "But why have you got such a long face?"
                       |SEAGOON: "Heavy dentures, Sir!"    - The Goon Show 
:-------------------------------------------------------------------------)