To: opendos AT delorie DOT com References: <4E29C70251 AT reze-1 DOT rz DOT rwth-aachen DOT de> Organization: Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, Russian Academy of Science Message-Id: From: pavel AT insect DOT mail DOT iephb DOT ru (Pavel V. Ozerski) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 15:19:38 +0400 (MSD) X-Mailer: dMail [Demos Mail for Windows NT v1.4b1] Subject: Re: Again about NTFSDOS Lines: 20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com >Please get in contact with the authors of NTFSDOS, and ask them to >download DR-DOS from ftp://ftp.lineo.com to trace NTFSDOS' init >under DR-DOS. I'm sure the problem is minor (but I cannot track I tried to contact with both (Mark Russinovich and Bryce Cogswell) for a very long time but they seem to be not very interested. One author answered that this utility is developed only for MS-DOS, the second also took this information into consideration but did nothing to fix problem (at least, the last NTFSDOS which I downloaded, contained some improvements to work with W'98 but again worked incorrectly with DR-DOS). May be, I must try to contact again? I could to try to do it, but I think, it would be better if this letter was from Caldera or even if from another DD-DOS user? Also I would be fully assured that this problem can occur not only on my computer. Also I'm ready to convert one partition into NTFS and to try to exeriment with NTFSDOS on DR-DOS (at least 1-2 days) but if someone (who knows good the DR-DOS kernel) will discuss my results while this "research" and help to find cause. May be, the good values (parameters) of FILES, FASTOPEN, SHARE etc could help to force NTFSDOS to work correctly on DR-DOS. But generally, if one utility has problem with DR-DOS, that points to possibility of similar problems by using of other system utilities. Therefore it could be very important, to find the cause of this problem.