Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:02:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Matthew W. Miller" <mattm AT infinet DOT com>
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: PTSDOS vs DRDOS (was Re: [NOVELL DR-DOS])
In-Reply-To: <3.0.16.19900702220113.2c5f38b8@hem.passagen.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007022245220.6232-100000@treehouse.infinet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, Bernie wrote:

>Joseph Morris wrote:
>>I found the DIR command to be lacking personally, but that's just my
>>opinion.
>IMHO the dir command in DR-DOS is lacking ;)

Isn't it, though?  I'm too used to 'ls' under UNIXoid operating systems,
myself.  DRDOS's 'xdir' is a good effort, but the balmy choices of switch
names make it confusing.

-- 
Matthew W. Miller -- mattm AT infinet DOT com