Message-ID: <007101bfdee0$20a52e40$11fea8c0@jgsd.co.uk.invalid>
From: "Ben A L Jemmett" <ben DOT jemmett AT ukonline DOT co DOT uk>
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
References: <002301bfde9b$eaf539a0$0abf06d5 AT mad> <3956310C DOT C5EA4DC5 AT pysmatic DOT net> <39564358 DOT AE20BEC6 AT internet1 DOT net> <3956500B DOT C2E3A355 AT pysmatic DOT net>
Subject: Re: Opiniom on Different versins of DOS
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:59:44 +0100
Organization: Jemmett Glover Software Development
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

> MS-DOS 3.2 didn't work, only 3.21 was any good.
I've been using 3.2 since 1986 without any trouble.  There were some reports
of Amstrad PCs trashing their harddrives due to a bug in the supplied
MS-DOS, but Amstrad had been hacking at that code as well.

Regards,
Ben A L Jemmett
(http://web.ukonline.co.uk/ben.jemmett/, http://www.deltasoft.com/)