Message-ID: <39565489.8304E0DB@pysmatic.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 11:50:49 -0700
From: Neal <lbneal AT pysmatic DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: good DOS - bad DOS
References: <004f01bfded1$519f78c0$34be06d5 AT mad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

DR-DOS 7.03 has several improvements, however some of them are bugs...

Borland C++ will not run in 7.03 due to memory management problems introduced
in 7.03. (I need Borland C++ :-) )

These changes were added just before development was halted and thus problems
have
never been addressed.

If 7.03 works fine for you, then use it.  If you have troubles, 7.02 might
resolve them.

Neal

Christoph Fuchs wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > Good DOS: PC-DOS 3.1 & 3.3, MS-DOS 3.1, 3.3, 4.01 & 6.22, DR-DOS 6.0 &
> 7.02, Novell DOS 7.
> > Bad DOS: MS-DOS 3.2, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0, DR-DOS 3.41 & 5.0, PC-DOS 3.2, 4.0,
> 5.0 & 6.0.
> > Iffy DOS: DR-DOS 7.03, OpenDOS 7.01, MS-DOS 7 (hidden in Win95).
>
> Can anybody tell me why DR-DOS 7.02 is better than DR-DOS 7.03?
> I only use #7.03, but I tried #7.02, too.
> In my opinion, #7.03 is the better one. Or isn't it like this?
>
> __________________________________________
> Visit the DocDOS Site
> (www.docdos.de / www.drdos.de) for
> great DOS Stuff....