Message-ID: <004f01bfded1$519f78c0$34be06d5@mad>
From: "Christoph Fuchs" <christoph DOT fuchs AT docdos DOT de>
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: good DOS - bad DOS
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 20:15:17 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com

Hi!

> Good DOS: PC-DOS 3.1 & 3.3, MS-DOS 3.1, 3.3, 4.01 & 6.22, DR-DOS 6.0 &
7.02, Novell DOS 7.
> Bad DOS: MS-DOS 3.2, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0, DR-DOS 3.41 & 5.0, PC-DOS 3.2, 4.0,
5.0 & 6.0.
> Iffy DOS: DR-DOS 7.03, OpenDOS 7.01, MS-DOS 7 (hidden in Win95).


Can anybody tell me why DR-DOS 7.02 is better than DR-DOS 7.03?
I only use #7.03, but I tried #7.02, too.
In my opinion, #7.03 is the better one. Or isn't it like this?

__________________________________________
Visit the DocDOS Site
(www.docdos.de / www.drdos.de) for
great DOS Stuff....