Message-Id: <200004031349.JAA30330@server1.mich.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
From: "Mark at Cross+Road's" <mark1 AT mich DOT com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 08:49:39 +0500
X-Mailer: Net-Tamer 1.12 Beta
Subject: DPMI Continued
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com


Hello All,
    Is there a tested and tried DPMI replacement for the DrDOS #703 version
or another dpmi product that responded more tolerently to third party
software?  Or is it that the errors which show-up as emm386 "errors", would
be simular to any dpmi product and are in the third party software and not
truly the problem of the dpmi?
    The dpmi=off does solve the problem however the loss of memory with this
solution is quite drastic and may not allow the program which you desired to
have run at that point due-to a lack of free memory.
    It seems to be a endless circle and I did read the article posted here a
week or so ago about Drdos dpmi and it made it sound as if the Drdos dpmi
was more true to form and thus more desirable.
    What have others done in this situation with the Dpmi of Drdos?
       Mark