Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 12:00:02 -0700 (MST)
From: Charles Dye <raster AT nmia DOT com>
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Possible DR-DOS enhancements
In-Reply-To: <200001131400.JAA32664@ren.bignet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.1000113115620.23112B-100000@plato.nmia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: dj-admin AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Mark in Clinton TWP. MI wrote:
 
>   It was my understanding that the case against Microsoft was over and won
> on Drdos behalf, has anyone else read this and if confirmed does it change
> the current progress of Drdos?

Not "won" but settled out-of-court.  I imagine that means some money
for Caldera, but precious little incentive for Microsoft to amend its
ways.

Scary thought:  perhaps Caldera acquired DR-DOS *only* as a legal
maneuver.  If so, with the lawsuit over, DR-DOS is well and truly
dead.  I hope I'm wrong, though.

raster AT highfiber DOT com