Message-Id: <200001131400.JAA32664@ren.bignet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: From: "Mark in Clinton TWP. MI" Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:58:42 -0600 X-Mailer: Net-Tamer 1.11.2 Subject: Re: Possible DR-DOS enhancements Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com It was my understanding that the case against Microsoft was over and won on Drdos behalf, has anyone else read this and if confirmed does it change the current progress of Drdos? Also, wasn't there another Drdos list at /rim com or such? I hadn't recieved any mail from that list for Drdos in a very long time has it been shut-off? Mark On 2000-01-12 opendos AT delorie DOT com said: >>Matthias Paul writes: >>>Related to DR-DOS, although independently developed by me (it >>>depends on Caldera/Lineo if this may happen to become part of >>>Lineo's next DR-DOS box, like many of the 7.02/7.03 enhancements >>>were): [etc.] >>Is there any reason to believe that Caldera / Lineo might do any >>further development on DR-DOS? As far as I can tell, there have >>been no updates of any kind since last April. Good grief, they're >>still shipping that disastrously buggy FDISK! It seems that >>Lineo is just letting it die. Too bad.... >>raster AT highfiber DOT com >Lineo should do one of two things with DR-DOS: >1.) Continue work on it, and fix the bugs, or if they won't... >2.) GNU Public License it and let people hack as they will. >--.\\<-H-- >/==============================================================\ >|| _ || >|| * \ Sorry, a signature error has occurred. || >|| _|_ || >|| / \ /============\ /===========\ || >|| | | | Resume | | Restart | || >|| \_____/ \------------/ \----|\-----/ || >|| | \ || >\============================================| _\============/ >Michelle Klein-Hass... |/\ \ >That's Ms. Geek to you! \_\