From: "..." <yesss AT escape DOT com>
Message-Id: <199903210334.WAA01229@escape.com>
Subject: Re: FDISK problems
To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 22:34:03 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.16.19990320121749.2e9f140e@highfiber.com> from "Charles Dye" at Mar 20, 99 12:17:49 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Charles Dye. Thank you! I owe you bigtime for 
the time you spent following through on my DR-DOS 
7.02 FDISK'd hdd-MS DOS conflict, and Caldera owes 
you even bigger for your thorough analysis.
 
May I pick your brain one more time? Is the 
difference between MS-DOS 6.0 and MS-DOS 6.22 FDISKs 
significant? Would MS DOS 7 FDISK be preferable to 
6.0? Having used DR-DOS 6 steadily from release till 
I installed beta 7.02, I have a limited collection 
of FDISKs, and I paid no heed to the noises made 
at the time of release about MS DOS 6.0's flaws, 
but by luck I have an FDISK floppy. 		--Fisher
 
======================================= adpFisher <yesss AT escape DOT com> nyc