From: "..." Message-Id: <199903101643.LAA11858@escape.com> Subject: Re: dr dos fdisk and ms dos To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:43:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.16.19990309201329.30270018@highfiber.com> from "Charles Dye" at Mar 9, 99 08:13:29 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: opendos AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: opendos AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk << To be fair, I think the problem you're having isn't really with DR DOS per se (the DR DOS kernel,) but with DRI's FDISK (an associated utility program.) >> --raster AT highfiber DOT com Hi, Charles. I agree (100%) that dr-dos 7.02 beta FDISK, not the kernel, is the prob--alas [a trashed C: after booting with MS DOS and making calls to C:]. << If I find some free time this week, I'll try to recreate the problem, using the DR DOS FDISK program on both DR DOS 7.02 and MS-DOS 6.22. >> I'd *love* to know if the prob is local. If your hdd is dr-dos beta 7.02 FDISK'd, all you really need do is boot with an MS DOS floppy and get a dir of C:. If my experience is any guide, if the dir is scrambled and you make no other calls to C:, when you reboot with dr-dos the partition will be OK. But even a set command that involves C: will leave the partition wrecked. A dir of E:, where my win95 cab files are, was *not* scrambled by an MS DOS dir command (go figure). I haven't tried FDISK'ing a C:\OLDMBR.BIN for restoration purposes. If everything else in C: is trashed, why wouldn't that file be too? All I keep on C: are necessary system files--not even COMMAND.COM--and a swap subdir, so rebuilding C: is a yawn (reformat with a rescue-floppy six-line .bat). The MS DOS releases at issue in my case are problematic. My last MS DOS was v3. The ones that have caused the problem are the undifferentiated MS DOS 6 that powers the Compaq setup/diags firmware and the win95 install boot floppy MS DOS that VER's as "Windows 95 [version 4.00.950]." << If I can duplicate it, I'll write out a nice detailed bug report for Caldera. Kinda hate to do that, because I still haven't *paid* for Caldera's release of DR DOS, but it's a fairly serious problem. >> Well, the prob is serious to *me*, and I'll be delighted if you find time to determine whether it is mine alone. Caldera seems to invite beta reports without regard to purchase. ... Ciao. --Fisher ======================================= adpFisher nyc ========================================