Message-Id: <199805200441.XAA25322@endeavor.flash.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <2ndsight AT taconic DOT net>
From: "Mark AT BlinkLink DOT NET  AKA" <mwarchol AT flash DOT net>
CC: <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 00:41:31 +0400
Subject: Re: Windows 3.11 and DR DOS 7.02.
Precedence: bulk


Congrads!  Glad to hear it.  I ran into that problem about 3 or so months
ago and followed the instructions on bug reporting and sent it to support
and a week or so later I really did get an answer that it was being listed
into the "book".  That message came from some place out there still related
to Digital and dos support!  It was really strange because it was an address
that I couldn't even respond to!  At least it has been noted.
    I wonder what happens now that M-S is being taken on by the justice
department and also that thing about them also being sued by C based on the
ability to separate dos from windows thing and now that statement by M-S
about dumping all of those copies of DrDOS that they had stached away?  Now
at least if it wasn't for real-audio I don't think I'd ever be going into
windows.
       Mark