To: viking AT flying-brick DOT caverock DOT co DOT nz Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com References: <354d3d1a DOT flying-brick AT flying-brick DOT caverock DOT net DOT nz> Message-Id: From: "Arkady V.Belousov" Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 16:40:33 +0400 (MSD) Organization: Locus Reply-To: ark AT mos DOT ru Subject: Re: Bug List - where? Lines: 23 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Comment-To: Eric Gillespie Салям! 4-Май-98 16:59 viking AT flying-brick DOT caverock DOT co DOT nz (Eric Gillespie) wrote to "Glenn W. McCorkle" , opendos AT delorie DOT com: EG> Captains Log, Stardate 3 May 98 19:45, Glenn W. McCorkle: EG> : What bugs? This is OpenDos, not MSDosn't. EG> Once you get used to the differences (or improvements) from MS it seems to EG> feel better except for the batch behaviour. I STILL haven't managed to get EG> FOR %f.c IN (*.c) ren %f.c 32%f.c EG> to work how I want it to work. 8-( And why you think this must work? ______________O\_/_________________________________\_/O______________ @echo off FOR %%i.txt IN (*.txt) do echo %%i.c _____________________________________________________________________ O/~\ /~\O Under NDOS this shows only corresponfing amount of `.c', under MS-DOS's command.com I get "Syntax error"...