To: opendos AT delorie DOT com
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 16 DOT 19980102214118 DOT 3df70018 AT popd DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
Message-Id: <AJiYjhqOIU@belous.munic.msk.su>
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date: Sun,  4 Jan 1998 03:32:44 +0300 (MSK)
Organization: Locus
Reply-To: ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject: Re: Answers!
Lines: 13
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

X-Comment-To: Flash Braden

Hi!

2-ñÎ×-98 23:42 anathema AT ix21 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com (Flash Braden) wrote to OpenDOS <opendos AT delorie DOT com>:

 > Basic to C translator?  Are you fishing for flames?

     Why not? Why you accept principle of translation from, say, C/C++,
Pascal or BASIC to machine code or ASM, but astonished by translation to
another _universal_ language (which allow to build virtual machine through
library's set of functions, as for Pascal to C converters, to builtin
interpreter, as for SQL to C converter) from any other language?