Sender: villani AT server1 DOT iop DOT com
Message-ID: <34A3A1C4.167E@iop.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 1997 07:23:32 -0500
From: Pat Villani <patv AT iop DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ark AT mos DOT ru
CC: fd-dev AT list DOT freedos DOT org, opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Kernel status (was interesting phenomenon and Super Improved     Freedos?)
References: <34A10B3A DOT 1CFB AT iop DOT com> <AB5CMeqO9P AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
>      As result, I must say: DOS is bad in terms of _expansion_ becuase
> 16-bit model and ugly design. I think, redesigned DOS be (and must?) have a
> likeness with original Unixes (like Linux, may be). But, if we talk about
> current state, then DOS (as I say before) can cover most specialists
> requirements, so they state must be present in sources as is (for
> compatability reason) before going to next projects, and _first_ step must
> be development of develompent ;) tools. B-|
> 
> [...]
> 
> P.S. I recently look at listing from BC++ and think - what about "addon",
> which optimizes code through listing or .OBJ? What you think about? ;)

Are you volunteering?

Pat

-- 

+--------------------------------+------------------------------------+
| Pat Villani                    | Email:            patv AT iop DOT com     |
|                                | Amateur call:     WB2GBF           |
+--------------------------------+------------------------------------+ 
| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber."            |
| -- Albert Einstein                                                  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+