To: ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru
Cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
References: <AAfgjdq4W7 AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Message-Id: <ABlX3eqq8H@belous.munic.msk.su>
From: "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 01:17:19 +0300 (MSK)
Organization: Locus
Reply-To: ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject: Re: Performance questions & Re: OD7.02B - Should I upgrade to it?
Lines: 18
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

X-Comment-To: -= ArkanoiD =-

Hi!

23-δΕΛ-97 00:24 ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru (-= ArkanoiD =-) wrote to ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su:

 > =>      This is one reason why me liked "ln" ideology from UNIX'es. BTW, my
 > => \BAT directory contains some .bat files for reducing path in such way:
 > [dd]
 > Have you seen DOS softlinks driver? I posted it to the list some moths
 > ago - it works perfectly with OpenDOS and occupies ~0.5K RAM.
 > I wrote a ln utility for it - full shell version and restricted command.com
 > one.

     Unfortunately, I miss this, I think.

P.S. May be because I not like binaries from the mail ;) - I fear trojan
horses. B*]