Message-Id: Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 10:37:25 +0000 From: Matthias Paul To: opendos AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: OD7.02B - Should I upgrade to it? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Precedence: bulk [Reply part 2/2+1] ... DEBLOCK= FFFF for maximum performance. If a system has problems, A000, or even 0000 helps, but dramatically slows down the system. The internal default is automatic detection, which would already result in FFFF. MULTITRACK= related to DEBLOCK, but vice versa in some way. Should be ON if the systems supports MULTITRACK reads. Most systems do. MULTITRACK=ON is DEBLOCK=FFFF, MULTITRACK=OFF is DEBLOCK=0. FILES[HIGH]= Usually about 30-60 FCBS[HIGH]= Usually 1. Note, that on some systems, moving these structures in UMBs will dramatically reduce performance. On other systems, there is no impact on speed, and moving them high is recommended, if your applications don t have problems with handles in UMBs (some have). VERIFY= usually OFF (personally I prefer ON). VERIFY OFF can improve performance depending on the implementation of a drives driver, but also increases the risk of non-detected write errors. NWCACHE loaded? NWCACHE works at maximum performance with /DELAY=5000 /FLUSH=OFF, and with VERIFY=off. Well, yes, hard disk format speed has been improved dramatically. But I think, that s not what you re looking for... ;-) [Link] M$ INTERLNK/INTERSERVER. Yes, this is a known problem, and will probably not be solved. Note, that this is not a problem with OpenDOS, but with these programs, which are not DOS-compatible. The server heavily patches around in undocumented DOS. There are alot of better solutions on the market, and you could also use PNW to establish a connection via a serial/parallel port (SLIP/PPP MLID driver needed, I think it s part of the WebSpyder package). And there are also programs like DN, NC, FASTLYNX, or LAPLINK. (FILELINK might be a little slow nowadays). [Misc] >Also has stacker been improved in 7.02 from 7.01? No. >has any significant improvements been made to the memmory >manager(s) and DPMI/DPMS software? EMM386/DPMS have been improved, but changes can not be called major. However, sometimes even minor changes can be significant... ;-) (it depends on the programs you re using, I think.) DPMI has still problems with some applications. However, other DPMI applications (e.g. BP7) are running smootly, even under the multitasker. [part 3/2+1 following] ------------------------------------------------------------ Matthias Paul eMail: Web: http://www.rhrz.uni-bonn.de/~uzs180/mpdokeng.html